A Technology That Would Change The World (If It Exists) | Answers With Joe a technology that would change the world

by SUKhothaifc



终身订阅 Brilliant 可享受 20% 的折扣! 1989 年,Cold Fusion 就在现场注册,宣布研究人员 Fleischmann 和 Pons 通过在室温下引发聚变的化​​学过程产生能量。 当没有其他人能够复制他们的发现时,冷聚变成为几十年来最大的科学惨败之一。 但有些人认为他们走在正确的轨道上,他们的方法可能是改变世界的关键。 下面是文章和视频的链接。 在 Patreon 上支持我! 在有兴趣购买特斯拉吗? 使用我的推荐链接并获得折扣和福利:成为频道会员并在此处访问独家直播和内容:在我所有的地方关注我! Instagram: Snapchat: Facebook: Twitter: LINKS LINKS LINKS: MinutePhysics-Muon-Catalyzed Fusion Animation 的出色分解,展示了启用晶格的冷聚变方法:Pro-LENR 视频:LENR 研究档案:。

Images related to the topic a technology that would change the world

A Technology That Would Change The World (If It Exists) | Answers With Joe

A Technology That Would Change The World (If It Exists) | Answers With Joe

Search related to the topic A Technology That Would Change The World (If It Exists) | Answers With Joe

#Technology #Change #World #Exists #Answers #Joe
A Technology That Would Change The World (If It Exists) | Answers With Joe
a technology that would change the world
你可以在这里看到很多有用的信息: 在这里查看更多
你可以在这里看到很多有用的信息: 在这里查看更多

Related Posts

48 comments

Michael Combrink 14/12/2021 - 9:33 Chiều

Are muons naturally produced anywhere, from the sun, radioactive material, black holes,

Anti matter is expensive to make but radioactive material naturally shoots off a bit all the time, there's a company collecting anti matter for space travel

Reply
Michael Combrink 14/12/2021 - 9:33 Chiều

Ok my question, if this did work, would the palladium get ripped apart with every reaction
And what if a ton of nucleation sites got primed at the same time,
💥 BOOM 💥

Reply
Robyn Smith 14/12/2021 - 9:33 Chiều

I think that continuing research on things that can literally change the way that we (as a species) can travel through space is ABSOLUTELY WORTH IT! I also think that scientists by the masses should be collectively working on figuring out exactly how gravity works. That is another thing that would CHANGE EVERYTHING!

Reply
Ryan Katic 14/12/2021 - 9:33 Chiều

Everything worth exploring. so long as you accept that failure is totally an option

Reply
Duchess 14/12/2021 - 9:33 Chiều

Science is the modern worlds religion. and its priests are just as closed minded and arrogant.

Reply
SolarWinds AuroraBorealis 14/12/2021 - 9:33 Chiều

Hey Joe, thanks for all the eye opening vids. Question, do you make your living on YouTube or do you have a profession other than Answers with Joe? We'd be curious to know. Thanks!

Reply
Jason J 14/12/2021 - 9:33 Chiều

its sad that the scientific community would just give up on it bc 2 ppl are assholes. bummer. you never know.

Reply
King Nekogon 14/12/2021 - 9:33 Chiều

"Junk science or worth exploring?"
Focus on making Muons easier (cheaper) to make, or prevent them from sticking. Yeet the lattice bs out the window.

Reply
Christopher Caldwell 14/12/2021 - 9:33 Chiều

Imagine trying to explain something like GPS (which depends on the speed of light) to someone who thought Newton's Laws were "the final answer".

What it comes down to is "have you done the work?" If somebody comes to you with this really cool theory/idea AND can show you how they got there, all power to them.

It's really hard for me to declare that cold fusion is impossible with particles apparently going back and forth in time… but I'd want to see the chain of events leading up such an extraordinary claim.

Reply
Robert Deskins 14/12/2021 - 9:33 Chiều

Just remember archeology is NOT science the same way chemistry & physics is

Reply
LordPadriac 14/12/2021 - 9:33 Chiều

NASA won't touch emdrive no matter how promising it could be they're too regimented to take actual scientific risks anymore. Maybe it's a pipe dream but it's something that can only be tested in space. I think if someone with their very own private space fleet were to launch a study into and it played out…forget about going to see little green men or settling colonies – there's still too much other work that needs to be done like some way to mimic gravity. If the emdrive was tested and it worked and was perfected; whatever company did that would own energy and be the ONLY name in clean energy from that point on. If you have an engine that takes no power but generates movement then you have a way to spin a dynamo and beam that energy via laser or microwave back to Earth for use.

Reply
0x777 14/12/2021 - 9:33 Chiều

Cold fusion is about 20 years out.

Granted, it has been 20 years out for about half a century…

Reply
John Guerra 14/12/2021 - 9:33 Chiều

“The only true wisdom is in knowing you know nothing.”
― Socrates

Reply
Arash Arfaee 14/12/2021 - 9:33 Chiều

I can see one exception to your thinking ways. There are people that although they might not realize it, it is their jobs to force themselves to think differently. Scientists themselves or at leat those who do something big, usually start from not accepting things as is.
But in general, I agree with you. I can have the luxury of doubting everything around my own speciality, but I trust the rest to what majority of scientists can agree on them. Which Btw, at best 30% somewhat accurate and in time most of them will be discredited or replaced with a new version that many time is an improved version of the old views. I don't see a way to do better than this while one keeps studying and thinking and growing that might lead to some wisdom seeing things a bit better starting seeing things. And get back to the right side of the DK graph in a different level! 🤔

Reply
Whine 14/12/2021 - 9:33 Chiều

What most people don't know is that a Cold Fusion machine was invented, but it was stolen by the infamous PAYDAY gang for a certain right-leaning senator backed by a large oil conglomerate.

Reply
Vinny Lamoureux 14/12/2021 - 9:33 Chiều

It's worth the risk cuz the people who do it are so wedded to whatever it is that they might go ok nuts otherwise.

Reply
Stoney's Dead 14/12/2021 - 9:33 Chiều

I think skepticism can lead to cynicism and that's what we need to avoid. But as long as your skepticism is applied appropriately so that it doesn't squash creativity and thinking out of the box- it's a good thing I think. The w ay I look at it there's no way you can study it all- at some point if you're going to be educated and informed you have to take someone's word for it. At least when it comes to science I know and understand the means by which they arrived at their opinions- the scientific method. In reality I'm trusting that method- not them or their authority. This is why I feel it's super important that we hold these ppl accountable to following that method always- never deviating or letting bias skew the outcome any more than what's absolutely unavoidable. This means policing the way papers are published, the way labs operate, how experiments are carried out, etc. Because like any other institution science is not immune to the almighty influence of the dollar.

Reply
Ed Reusser 14/12/2021 - 9:33 Chiều

I wish you would have talked more about the lack of neutrons and the lack of other evidence that fusion took place. And yes I believe that this should be pursued. The fact that it works so well with muons means that the amount of energy required is in the same magnitude as that required. It may be possible to modify the substrate to get better results.

Reply
pedro pedrohan 14/12/2021 - 9:33 Chiều

8:22 i thought it was the other 1989

Reply
MoneyMakerUDV 14/12/2021 - 9:33 Chiều

And now, 2 years later, we are pretty close to implement this, at least progress is huge

Reply
Masternuckable 14/12/2021 - 9:33 Chiều

Fusion is at 97-98% efficiency at this point. Uber exciting!

Reply
Martin Samuelian 14/12/2021 - 9:33 Chiều

Joe, what about Max Planck's believes on consciousness? ps: you are very good at what you do. Well done

Reply
Joseph Stokes 14/12/2021 - 9:33 Chiều

GRAMMAR! _ Joe, I'm back! One cannot have something "between" three people! It is "among" when there are more than two!! Come on, this is sixth grade grammar!!

Reply
Christopher Zenga 14/12/2021 - 9:33 Chiều

Can you cut the opening to this and reupload for today’s world?

Reply
Jiminy Cricket 14/12/2021 - 9:33 Chiều

@2:14 – Had to see if this was a 2021 statement lol.

Reply
Rigo Torres 14/12/2021 - 9:33 Chiều

is Joe Scott a Scientist?

Reply
SELECTED SCIENCE SCIEZARD 14/12/2021 - 9:33 Chiều

but what if . . .

Reply
Neil Lizotte 14/12/2021 - 9:33 Chiều

I love your videos, but not this one, needs much more research

Reply
Eric Velasquez 14/12/2021 - 9:33 Chiều

I though Elisabeth Shue and Val Kilmer already discovered cold fusion

Reply
Saboteur 14/12/2021 - 9:33 Chiều

"A Technology That Would Change The World (If It Exists)"

I'm pretty certain the world exists.

Reply
Swegfesh 14/12/2021 - 9:33 Chiều

They should have called it "CON Fusion"

Reply
John 14/12/2021 - 9:33 Chiều

Even more true now with the pandemic

Reply
John Anthony DiMeglio 14/12/2021 - 9:33 Chiều

Well, it was brilliant – the original concept. It was revolutionary for sure. And maybe, just maybe, there's an international conspiracy to keep the lid on it. I mean would you accept from me right now $75,000 to take this video down and replace it with a lizard aliens video? Oh – you already did that? Well – okay, then!

Reply
Balin_James_Music 14/12/2021 - 9:33 Chiều

That intro perfectly reflects what’s happening today

Reply
natureboy tom 14/12/2021 - 9:33 Chiều

Say whattt?

Reply
Mr Kokolore 14/12/2021 - 9:33 Chiều

Fusion cores.

Reply
C PL 14/12/2021 - 9:33 Chiều

So, why the fuck haven't you done that yet, instead of doubling down on the tar sands and pipelines?!?

Reply
Michael Cox 14/12/2021 - 9:33 Chiều

Muon-catalyzed fusion was predicted by Andrei Sakharov in the USSR, and verified by Luis Alvarez (the elder dinosaur meteor guy) in '56.

Reply
Ali Reza Rahmani 14/12/2021 - 9:33 Chiều

well, another great work by Joe! thanks very much!
I'm not a physicist of any kind, but from what I can remember from my physical metallurgy course years back, diffusing so many deuterium atoms into the Pd crystal would be next to impossible. You can think about it as a dissolution problem, it's fairly easy to dissolve the first spoon of sugar into your coffee but can you dissolve 10000 spoons in the same cup? maybe extreme conditions like RF currents would work, but the energy put into making it happen would exceed the output as with other methods as Joe mentioned. Now, I'm not a physicist as mentioned earlier, but as a researcher of nanomaterials, I wonder if they have been looking into the possibility of utilizing the more open surface lattice structure of nanostructured Pd… although I kind of feel like it would increase the chances of getting the spikes, but the repeatability and energy economy would indeed remain problematic.
Let's use SOLAR folks! artificial photosynthesis is a thing! we just have to make it feasible…

Reply
Jeffrey Droog 14/12/2021 - 9:33 Chiều

3:30 video finally begins…

Reply
The987654321andy 14/12/2021 - 9:33 Chiều

it is good that you paint the environment of what made this such a huge announcement.

Reply
Saltymfer 14/12/2021 - 9:33 Chiều

So “cold fusion” was basically 1989’s version of Cyberpunk 2077

Reply
Bryan Mcdonald 14/12/2021 - 9:33 Chiều

Spray some WD-40 on those muons. That stuff solves everything

Reply
Christopher Pitts 14/12/2021 - 9:33 Chiều

Dude, you look and sound like the stupid guy from Always Sunny in Philadelphia! What's his characters name, I think it's Charlie!! Yeah, are you Charlie?

Reply
Russ Hamilton 14/12/2021 - 9:33 Chiều

So just ignore motive?

Reply
Swooned 14/12/2021 - 9:33 Chiều

The real technology that will change the world is a new exchange model. To me, that is a no-cost currency. Not usury, not demurrage, no-cost. Completely free to use. Its value is based on the work of people choosing to be paid in it. My model, called BUXB, also pays for people to be educated, community and civil projects/infrastructure, and running of the bank. This allows the bank to be owned by the people. it also takes out any commodity of money, that meaning making money on money. Feel free to find out more by searching BUXXB. Happy to answer any questions through Facebook.

Reply
byron2521 14/12/2021 - 9:33 Chiều

The first time all the hype about cold fusion broke was over 30 years ago. That's when the 2 chemist went public claiming the breakthrough. After that long time with no further progress, it's had not to be skeptical.

Reply
Matthew Flores 14/12/2021 - 9:33 Chiều

The private sector regarding science and related discoveries will never be allowed to patent or integrate new technologies. Anything that would interfere w fossil fuel production has been silenced.

Reply

Leave a Comment